This is a good book for small business owners. How to Feed Friends and Influence People by Milton Parker and Allyn Freeman is and enjoyable and motivational ride. It’s about the success of the Carnegie Deli in New York.
Sure the book is a bit long winded in parts and you get the key business message in pages 2 and 3. The publishers are kind enough to provide a link to an excerpt at their website which includes pages 2 and 3. (Thanks!) However, the rest of the book provides the foundation to the brilliant strategies presented in pages 2 and 4. Plus other pages have recipes.
I’ve eaten at the deli and can vouch for it’s food and service. Beyond operating a successful deli, the business principles in the book work for anyone.
How to Feed Friends and Influence People is an enjoyable read and highly recommended.
Good to see the UK Office of Fair Trading pursuing banking justice for small business. Report: Find.co.uk Australian small busiinesses could use government agency spport like this.
It’s back to school time and the TV, radio and letterboxes are screaming about deals. It’s price, price and price. The national retail chains are screaming that their deals are the best. It seems that price is the only point of difference Big W, K-Mart, Officeworks, Harvey Norman and others want to pitch. There is little about quality, service and community commitment. These people know their market. Price is an easier sell than service and quality. An ad focusing on price cuts through easier than one focusing on these less tangible benefits. And there is where independent small retailers miss out. Even though they often compete on price they don’t have the budget.
Using our technology we try and help small business compete. We can list savings on receipts; print coupons drawing customers back in; and, run a loyalty campaign more valuable than anything the big boys do.
My point is that small business has the tools to better compete but too often does not use them to their fullest.
Big W, K Mart et al are not cheaper. They are just louder.
There are some aspects of owning and operating a (relatively) small software company which frustrate me. One is the user who wants it done their way in their time frame regardless of everyone else. We have a situation at present where a user has reported a problem and because we did not publish it as a bug right away he is (publicly) grumpy as all hell. I explained that we have a ‘proof’ obligation for reports of bugs to determine if indeed they are a bug. He wanted this proof process speeded up. We’d had two calls about the problem from more than 1,000 active users running the software on over 3,500 computers. Also, the reports we received were not consistent.
After several tests we were able to recreate the problem – but not exactly as the most vocal user reported to us. In his case his system (not supplied by us) crashed. This caused him to place a higher priority on the problem. In our testing we considered it annoying but certainly no show stopper.
We have advised our users of the problem, noted it as minor and issued a workaround to keep the few who will experience the problem happy until we issue a patch some time next week. It’s in a function of the software used a few times each year and it only occurs if one of the optional parts of the function is used.
None of these comments are written to dilute our obligation to correct bugs. Rather, I am concerned about the considerable time lost responding to the many emails from this one user demanding that we publish it as a bug and even in terms which suit him. What he wanted was not supported by the evidence. When I put that I was told I was not transparent etc etc. Some of this conversation was on our public discussion board which I established more than five years ago. Postings are not moderated. That, alone, demonstrates a level of transparency between my company and its user base.
Some people will never be satisfied. In this case, the bug itself was ot the issue. It was that we did not respond instantly, to the detriment of more pressing work, and that our response was not of a form acceptable to the user.
It’s the kind of interaction, which thankfully happens only occasionally, which makes me not enjoy owning the business.
The support call with a new client was like step back into the 1980s when now many small business owners had encountered computers in their businesses. But this call was today. The client on the end of the phone wanted to know what it meant to “click”. There was no “click” button. How could he “click” if there was no “click” button. He said it’s not fair that we ask him to do something he cannot do. It’s a fair point when you think about it – how much, we in the industry, take these additions to our language for granted and how much we expect people to be on our level when it comes to jargon.
Thinking about, it I can understand the caller’s frustration. They have a pretty simple small business. They don’t really need technology but must have it if they are to be acceptable to certain suppliers. So, as the technology provider, we are part of the compliance mechanism and this brings a level of frustration to their contact with us. It would be different if they came to us because they wanted to. Different, too, he this was not their first contact with computers.
It’s calls like these, over the simple matter of clicking the mouse, that force us to pause and consider how we communicate with clients, old and new.
In Kuala Lumpur last week we got to talking with a bartender asnd what he likes to drink. He made a personal concoction of his. Taking his name, John, and the need for grand quirky cocktail names, we dubbed it the Long Johnson. He then put it in his point of sale system as a bar item and we proceeded to drink several more Long Johnsons. What stuck us was the base liquor, Hpnotiq. Hpnotiq was launched in Australia a few weeks ago and late last year elsewhere. What is clever about Hpnotiq is the viral way blogs and the Net more generally are being used to spread the word – beyond the usual launch parties which get photographed for magazines. Hpnotiq is getting cred through word of mouth. The question has to be how much of the word of mouth is real or paid for marketing. In the case of the Long Johnson, it;s real. We asked for it, drank it, enjoyed it and recommend it as a good cocktail to start the evening. There’s something about it which is appealing to IT nerds.
The Long Johnson
1.5 parts Hpnotiq
.5 parts Triple sec
.5 parts Vodka
1 part Cranberry juice
1 part Grapefruit juice
Shake with ice and pour into cocktail glass.
.5 parts Grenadine – pour gently to get to the bottom
Drop in a maraschino cherry.
I arrived back in Melbourne this morning from four days in Kuala Lumpur with two work colleagues. Our flight arrived at the gate on time but we were kept from disembarking for over fifteen minutes while the aerobridge operator tried to maneuver the aerobridge to the plane door. Their poor efforts were watched by the planeload of people desperate for fresh air after a long flight. As seems to be usual with these things there were plenty of experts at the aerobridge with advice watching on but no one able to get it close to the plane. Once they did dock we heard one of them explain that the problem was that this aerobridge was too close to the second aerobridge at the gate and that’s why they could not get it closer. “We’ll know next time” they were heard to say. Okay but Tullamarine has been operating for decades.
Finally off the plane we were greeted with a mass of people at the Customs/Immigration counter waiting to be processed through. The line for foreign passport handlers was okay, it was the Australian passport line which snaked way back past the duty free store. I travel internationally frequently and this is the longest line I have ever seen at Melbourne Airport Immigration. Another 45 minute wait was much appreciated after a long flight and the long wait for the aerobridge to reach the plane. What frustrated the most was the number of Customs officers standing to the side or behind the desks looking on. They did not seem to be playing any role other than sharing anecdotes with each other. It would have been great to have more than four or five desks open. They seemed to have no plan for coping with the volume of passengers. The line was a mosh pit toward the back with no regulation. In most other countries this is handled much better.
While waiting for my 60 seconds at the Customs/Immigration desk I witnessed a Customers officer demean an Asian passenger. It was indiscrete behavior which deserved to result in a reprimand.
All in all not a good experience this morning at Melbourne’s Tullamarine Airport. It makes me wonder how they will cope with the Commonwealth Games travel influx in a few weeks. Based on today’s experience, Melbourne Airport needs to be avoided.
The Little Britain TV show is brilliant. Each character has a defining phrase. As developers of Point of Sale software some of us are latching on to the banking employee who randomly taps at her computer keyboard in response to a customer query before saying rather lamely: “computer says no”. Saying “no” is an important part of what our software does in trying to help small business owners not make mistakes in buying, extending credit and setting retail prices. We create barriers which help the business. A few days ago I saw a customer ask about a product and the employee, using our software, tapped away and then said “computer says no”. The employee and the customer enjoyed the joke. Watching this made me want to create a wav file which responds with the “no” instead of some nerd type message which one has to interpret before speaking to the customer.
I’m not happy that companies are using blogging in a corporate way – many using third parties to blog about their business on their behalf. A whole new business category has started and many agencies have introduces specialist blogging operations into their businesses. This is hijacking a medium for pure commercial use. Blogging is more pure than that. A blogger can be vulnerable in a way corporations are not. A blogger can share a personal view regardless of consequences in a a way a corporate blogger will not. A blogger gives on him/herself whereas a corporate blogger is as detached as corporations can be.
I hope that corporate sanitised adverblogs will be seen for what they are. The problem is that many consumers of blogs will not see that. Already blogs and commenters on blogs have hijacked the medium to make one really question what one reads.
If companies want to blog then they need to stay true to the medium. Make blogs personal. Give of yourself. Take a risk with openness. Don’t spin. Don’t pay someone else to blog for you.
My two blogs attract or two private emails a day – separate to logged comments. These private emails are from people who have read an entry and want to open a conversation with you, have a crack at your view or seek out more information. This contact is interesting not only because it’s connecting me with people I would otherwise not come into contact with but also because their questions and views extend mine.
I mention this because on ABC Radio last week I heard a newspaper person denigrate blogging as “not much better than gossip”. That may be true for some blogs and even some entries here. However, this ever growing conversation online and offline with people who read this blog and those who read other blogs adds to one’s view of the world and this can only lead to more thoughtful blog entries. The result will be better commentary through blogging than many of the singular view commentaries we see in daily newspapers.
The more feedback a blogger who takes their efforts at the keyboard seriously receives the better their published contributions. Keep it up!
I was at Coles on the weekend and made the mistake of asking how much I had to spend before I could get something free through FlyBys. “you have to go to the website” was the answer, followed by “they don’t tell us that stuff”. Okay, I can understand it might be a bit much detail. Even though I knew the answer I thought I’d compare what a Coles checkout person knows about flybys compared to the loyalty promotion I run in my retail newsagency. (It’s of interest to me because we have just introduced new loyalty facilities in the software we supply newsagents with.) This checkout person was no help. They didn’t have anything at the counter to answer my questions. Even though I spent close to $200.00 I could get no idea of how close I was to getting some value from the spend, some recognition for loyalty.
My point is that retailers have an obligation to be transparent about their loyalty schemes. If they promote rewards they need to disclose the value of rewards earned with each transaction. They also need to ensure that their front line associates can do more to answer a customer query than point one to a website.
I’d prefer to shop elsewhere but Coles is the closest and my sense is that they’ll win more market share by buying competitors out – look at liquor and fuel over the last two years. Consumers have less choice and with that comes worse prices and poor service.
Based on years of poor big business experience and mucking around in my own small retail business, at my software company we’ve created solid transparent facilities in our loyalty software which help independents retailers show the bug players how to deliver honest and transparent customer service.
Gary Hall (above) organised bad shirt day Friday to raise money for the Greenpeace campaign against the Japanese ‘scientific research’ into whales. What surprised me was that no one really wore what I’d call a bad shirt. Now, you’d expect that with a company full of computer nerds there would be some really bad shirts. Just about everyone admitted that they liked their bad shirt and they wore it only because they thought others would not like it. For our next fund raiser we need to organise a really bad shirt day with penalties for those who play it safe.
There was some healthy debate about the Greenpeace campaign against the Japanese – the kind of debate which is good for any open workplace where opinions are encouraged.
The other interesting take away for me from the Hong Kong trade show I attended this past week was that companies presenting did not want photos taken because they didn’t want you copying what they were doing. Fair enough. But then some of these companies make their living out of copying others so the double standards were exposed. The number of times I saw Disney and other branded product which was not available for ordering if you asked whether they had approval to use the images. Hmm..
We have long standing hardware standards. Being in the point of sale software space it’s important because things like barcodes cannot be printed on any old printer and because our software is tuned for very specific hardware. In the last two weeks we’ve had several of our clients soak up way more than their fare share of help desk time because of issues with hardware we did not supply and which does not comply with our standards. This is frustrating because of the time it takes us away from helping those who do the right thing. When we point to the standards one says well it used to work; another says they don’t care about the standards and will complain publicly about us if we do not fix one niggly aspect of the software on their old and non standard hardware. We’ve resolved to take a firm view on this out of respect for 99% of our client base who adhere to the standards and who call less frequently as a result. It’s a difficult road to navigate, especially in the small business space where so many relationships are personal – being the traffic cop and the people who sell the vehicle as well.
I’ve found the ideal corporate promotional gift. All day sucker candy with your logo. Deep inside is a light which lights up when you lick the thing. Yep, I can see my software clients going for that. Hmm… No. I’m just back this morning from a trade show in Hong Kong and boy do they have some wild products – especially in the promotional space. I’m not sure how I feel about someone licking my logo. Violated is a feeling that comes to mind. Ugh. No, I don’t want a prospect or a client linking my logo. And I’m not sure how they would feel about it either. I mean, what if they bit into this sucker and break off a tooth? Or what if they don’t like the taste? Or what if they give it to their kid and they go hyper because of some crazy chemical in this all day sucker. The more I think about this the more I realise it’s a promotional product which should not have left the drawing board. But then people all through the trade show were sucking these things. It was really weird seeing people licking these things and the lights inside blinking. Freaky.
On the other hand, it’s something people would talk about and isn’t that the idea of marketing? No, I think that my POS software requires a more refined outcome focused product giveaway. I’ll pass on the lit all day sucker this time.
I am surprised that the announcement of the massive extension to the Chadstone shopping mall remains unchallenged in the press. Besides a couple of stories on December 22 it’s been very quiet yet many small businesses in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne face a significant impact as a result of the development. When I heard the news I expected a wave of protests. Maybe people don’t care or maybe they don’t understand the implications of a giant shopping mall growing by another 50%.
Jeff Jarvis’ Dell Hell blog entries are legendary way beyond the blogosphere. I have a local story about Dell which casts a shadow over their self proclaimed commitment to customer service.
While you can purchase ink and toner for Canon, Lexmark, HP, Epson and a bunch of other printers from wherever you choose, if you have a Dell printer you have to go back to Dell. We discovered this first hand when we tried to supply ink to a client with a Dell printer. The wholesalers we spoke with told us the client had to go back to Dell.
If this continues Dell will lose what should be easy repeat business when these customers want a new printer.
The weekend newspapers delivered another profile of Prime Minister in waiting, Peter Costello. In a soft interview Costello gets us no closer to what he thinks. Sure there is talk about the abortion pill and gay marriage – topics which appeal to his constituency. But what of other issues, issues which the media does not cover – like small business policy. What does Mr Costello think about small business, and its role in Australia today? On small business Mr Costello could carve out a significant point of difference and move the government from spinning on small business to actually doing something. This also helps employees, suppliers and the government – I’d suggest that small business pays a higher proportion of tax per $1 sale than big business. I could be wrong – it would be worth investigating.
Each day our shopping malls and streets become less individual and more clones. This puts people out of work, stifles creativity and kills off Australian culture.
Mr Costello should get the government active and: determine the real economic, social and environmental impact of big businesses like Coles and Woolworths compared to small business; find out what Australians want (independent or clone) and talk to local government about ways they can stop big business ruining the fabric of local communities.
I’d also suggest an overhaul of government tax breaks and grants for big business compared to small business. There is no sense in providing government incentives to businesses which don’t benefit the community.
It was a thrill today to be in a shop happily using a version of our software which was first released in the late 1980s, especially when you consider the pressure from IT companies (like mine) that you need the latest to grow your business. The people using this ancient software like it as it does the job they require of it. While it does not have the time saving benefits of current standard software for that industry they like it because they know it and don’t mind putting in extra time on manual processes.
Seeing their use of the software made me feel that IT and what we do at Tower Systems is less disposable than I had thought.
My software company services in four marketplaces. Most of our clients are newsagents. We work with close to thirty suppliers to newsagents and facilitate the electronic loading of invoice data from suppliers to newsagents. It frustrates me that three major suppliers to newsagents – News Limited, Fairfax and Group Newsagency Supplies (GNS – a newsagent stationery wholesale co-operative) are the worst at providing clean data. These same three are also the worst at general IT implementation which cold save many hours each week in small business newsagencies.
The EDI developments which would be necessary for News Ltd, Fairfax and GNS to implement have already been implemented by Hallmark, John Sands, For Arts Sake, other card companies, magazine distributors, tobacco wholesalers and many others. It’s not brain surgery.
News Ltd, Fairfax and GNS need to want newsagents to have the ability to run their businesses efficiently. Based on their current practices I’d suggest this is not a high priority for these three companies. They are happy with an incomplete IT link with newsagents. They get what they want and bugger the newsagents and they time they lose in their businesses.
It is unfair that newsagents are treated poorly by these suppliers and are therefore forced to lose many hours in their shops each week on manual data processes which lead to in store mistakes and cost each business significant revenue.
I’d tired of big business suppliers complaining about small business when I know that these three companies are focusing at least 4,600 small businesses in Australia to live in the dark ages.
Years ago Coles refused to accept stock which was not barcoded. Maybe newsagents could refuse to deal with suppliers who do not meet basic EDI standards. Of course this would require newsagents to be united and actually see through the ban. It won’t happen.
I risk getting into trouble from the suppliers I have named. They will say I should have gone to them first. Well, I have, many times over recent years. Absolutely no progress has been made. I am using this blog entry with feint hope to shame them into some action. This small business channel deserves more esepcially from News Ltd and Fairfax.
What’s in it for me? Nothing really other than the comfort that newsagents will actually gain hours back thanks to better use of their IT resources.
On September 16 I wrote here about my experiences with the Australian Tax Office. At the same time I wrote a letter of complaint to the ATO. I followed it up a month later and then again a month after that. No response now from three letters. This is despite evidence of double standards in terms of the Privacy Act and appallingly poor customer service.
If they want money they will pursue you more than vigorously. If you want just treatment from them, and you’re from a small business like mine, they’ll ignore you. This is appalling customer service. My questions are fair and deserve to be answered. Indeed several questions need to be answered before the actual matter I have with them is resolved.
Of course there is a risk bitching about the ATO here. Maybe it earns one an entry on a watch or even audit list.
My request of the ATO is not unreasonable – answer your letters, list your customer service focus. I am a taxpayer and deserve to be treated with respect, and on time respect at that.
I hope other Australian taxpayers blog about their experiences. It galls me to read about individuals and corpo0rations walking away from huge tax liabilities when the small folk are the ones pursued to the end of the earth. Maybe their collection policy is like their customer service/correspondence policy – the little guy is treated differently to the big fish.
To their credit a senior executive from OzJet called me today to discuss my blog entries here complaining about their handling of the cancellation of their January 1 services between Melbourne and Sydney. He was genuinely concerned at how the cancellation and subsequent downgrading to Qantas economy had been handled. He was also concerned that I had not received a response from the complaint I had lodged on their website.
It was a positive customer service discussion and encourages me about their commitment to deliver on their marketing pitch.
Contrary to Jeff Jarvis’ experience with Dell (as documented in his Dell Hell blog postings, my experience today with OzJet is encouraging and I’m glad to have human interaction of what was a frustrating experience.
I’ve been promised follow-up on a couple of points so there is another opportunity to redeem. I hope it works out because the OzJet product is good.