Every sale processed through retail software leaves a record. Over a year, a small shop builds up a detailed account of what its customers actually did, as opposed to what the owner remembers them doing.
In our experience, there is often a disconnect between how people talk about the performance of a business, suppliers to the business or products and the actual performance as reflected in the data collected by the POS software. This disconnect can cost the business plenty of money through ill-informed decisions, slow decisions and more.
Memory versus the data
Retailers form impressions on the shop floor, and impressions are shaped by whatever stood out. A difficult customer. A busy Saturday. A supplier rep who visited last week.
The data is not swayed by any of that. It will show a department that has quietly declined for eight months, or a range everyone assumed was working and was not, or stock bought in March still sitting there in August.
The floor view and the data view work best together. A retailer with both is well ahead of one relying on either alone.
Where to look first
Dead and slow-moving stock. Usually the fastest return in the whole exercise. Cash tied up in stock that has not moved for six months is cash unavailable for stock that would move. Most retailers running this report for the first time are surprised by the total.
Department and category performance over time. Not this week against last week, which is mostly noise, but this year against last year, by department. Trends take months to show themselves.
Basket composition. What sells alongside what. Products that sell together should usually sit together, so this answers merchandising questions directly.
Trading by day and hour. Rostering and opening hours often rest on habit. The data settles the argument one way or the other.
Supplier performance. Which suppliers deliver stock that sells, and at what margin. That is a different question from which rep is easiest to deal with.
Customer behaviour. Who returns, how often, and what they buy on the second visit.
Making it a habit
Reporting only works when it is regular. A protected monthly hour in the diary does more than an occasional deep dive.
Start with one report and understand it properly before adding another. A retailer who acts on a dead stock report every month is ahead of one who runs twelve reports and acts on none.
Write down what the numbers prompted, then check next month whether it worked.
The Retailer AI tools in the Tower Systems software help here. An end of shift summary in plain text compares the day with recent trading, in place of five or six pages of reports. Other tools flag what is selling, what is not, and what the business appears to be missing.
The shift that matters
Retailers who work from evidence buy differently. They quit dead stock earlier and back winners harder. They also stop defending decisions the numbers stopped supporting months ago.
No new technology is needed for any of this. The software is already in the shop; what changes is the habit.
Tower Systems software includes extensive reporting, and training on how to use it is free for the life of the subscription.
Recent Comments